|
Chapter 1 Mishna 1 Essay 1 Introduction
Moshe Ki'bel Torah M'Sinai: MOSHE RECEIVED (ki'bel) TORAH FROM SINAI AND
TRANSMITTED IT (u'm'sa-ra) TO JOSHUA, AND JOSHUA TO THE ELDERS, AND THE ELDERS
TO THE PROPHETS, AND THE PROPHETS TRANSMITTED IT TO THE MEN OF THE GREAT
ASSEMBLY. A.
The beginning
of the first Mishna begs for some understanding. If the purpose of the statement above is to tell us the location
it should have said AT or ON Sinai, a very definable place. Why the use of the word FROM? We are not interested in location here;
our concern is a relationship, which the word 'from' connotes. We are emphasizing the source from whence these ethics derive. They are G-d given; they stem from the same
source as all the other religious laws.
They have the same validity as the laws of Shabbos, Kashrus, Family
Purity (Taharas Hamishpa-cha) because they were given to Moshe by G-d on
Sinai. This is fundamental! True, the human mind is rational and one can argue
that even if we were not given the ethical laws on Sinai, a decent human being
would perforce observe them nonetheless. Who could justify killing? Who could justify stealing, cheating? Who cannot see the 'morality' of honoring
father and mother or helping the poor?
It's axiomatic! We offer two responses: 1.
The Torah view
is that even what we accept axiomatically as 'good' and 'evil' is something
that Hashem implanted in us. This idea
is expressed in the Midrash (B'rayshis
Rabbah 2:5) Rebbe Abavhu said:
At the beginning of the world's creation, The Holy One, Blessed be He,
gazed at the deeds of the reighteous and at the deeds of the wicked. ...The
world was 'tohu v'vaohu' (Brayshis 1:3) refers to the deeds of the wicked. "and G-d said Let there be light"
refers to the deeds of the righteous.
But still I would not know which of them He desires....the deeds of
these of the deeds of those. However,
once Torah writes..."And G-d saw the light that it was Good (Brayshis
1:4)...it is the deeds of the righteous that He desires and He does not desire
the deeds of the wicked. 2.
Who could
justify killing?!? Look at the
holocaust. It happened. A society
created a new 'morality' where genocide became acceptable, where selection
based on racial qualities was the ideal, and where dishonor to parents, by
spying and reporting on them to authorities became the norm. Look at the Socratian concept of 'Justice is
in the interest of the stronger' and
Hobbes' 'dog eat dog' pessimism about
human nature, and you question how inviolate some of our basic concepts of
'good' and 'evil' are. The Mishna establishes that ethics are from Sinai, and
are absolute. Man has no authority to
tamper with it lest he destroy himself and the world. The messages and the codes of conduct what will be
henceforth taught are not arbitrary, man-made rationalizations. B.
As a corollary,
having acknowledged G-d's authorship of Ethics, it follows that Fear of Heaven
must precede the study of Torah. Later
in the Mishna we learn that...he whose
fear of Heaven and fear of sin precedes his study of Torah...his Torah will be
sustained. But he whose study of Torah is not predicated on fear of Heaven, his
Torah will dissipate. There are teachers of ethics in the universities whose
lives have double standards.....one in the classroom and the other on the
outside... both in opposition. One who
is truly enveloped by Torah is a whole personality and his life by example as
well as precept is the message. C.
There is an
interchange of terms in the Mishna. It speaks of Moshe receiving and then transmitting to Joshua, to the elders, the prophets,
etc. Why the change in format? It could have stated either that each one received
or each generation transmitted. 1.
The message
here is that the Torah that Moshe received from Hashem, by its very nature of
having been given by G-d, is infinite in quantity and depth. No human can fathom its intensity. Notwithstanding what Hashem was prepared to
transmit to Moshe, Moshe could only receive what he, as a human, was capable of
receiving. Having received the Torah from Hashem, Moshe could
then transmit it to the next generation, ad infinitum. The Torah recognizes the finiteness of man and
suggests that the understanding
of Torah is something that each individual will attain in different
measure according to his capacity. The fulfillment
of the Mitzvohs of the Torah, however, are independent of a complete
understanding of their infinite nature and value. Can a finite mind comprehend the infinite wisdom? 2.
The term kibayl
(received) suggests something which he earned. Indeed, this is hinted at by the use of this
word. There is a famous Midrash which
describes Moshe's ascent onto Mt. Sinai, and engaging in a debate with the angels
about Hashem's granting the Torah to Israel.
The angels argued before G-d: Who
is Man that you find him worthy to receive such a Divine document? How can You
give such a G-dly document to flesh and blood? Moshe parried their argument: Do you have need of a Torah? You are angels; by definition, you have no
desires, no lusts no avarices. What
would you do with the commands “Do not steal,” “Do not murder,” “Do not commit
adultery?” You don’t need Torah! The function of Torah is to purify man and
to elevate him out of the flesh and blood mentality. The function of Torah is to show man that his soul is a part of
Hashem, and to strive for communion with Hashem – by living in an ethical and
G-d fearing way. Moshe won! He received the Torah. (Question:
What was the presumption of the angels in claiming the Torah for
themselves? They knew its contents
could never apply to them) D.
Moshe received
Torah from Sinai. The chronology of
that event is as follows: After having heard the Asseres Hadibros, the Ten
Commandments from Sinai, Moshe ascended onto the mountain and remained there
for 40 days and nights. The Torah
describes that he ate no bread nor drank no water. What Did Moshe Do on Sinai for 40 Days and Nights ??? He received the Torah on Sinai. Now this can't be the Written Torah, as we
know it as the Five Books of Moses, since we know that some mitzvos, like
Shabbos, were given prior to Sinai, and most were recorded after the event at
Sinai. There is a debate in the Talmud
as to whether the Torah was written all at one time by Moshe, or section by
section throughout the 40 year trek through the desert. But one thing is certain that the text of the Written
Law was not given on Sinai, with the exception of the
Ten Commandments, which were oral and which were then given to Moshe engraved
by Hashem in stone. So, the question
what was given to Moshe on Sinai during
those 40 days? Moshe received the Oral Law on Sinai. The Oral Law is the basis for the Written
Law. Without the Oral Law, the Written
Law, that what we all see in the Holy Ark in the synagogue, is
meaningless. The Written Law is merely
a set of cryptic notes, symbols, shorthand abreviations for a more expansive,
fundamental and complete sytem of a blueprint for the world and life. Let me illustrate.
The basis for our liberty in these United States is the
Constitution. Can a short concise document
like the Constitution contain all the laws that cover every facet of a nation's
life? It is absurd to think so. It is a
compendium of all the values upon which our freedoms and rights are built. It abstracts the values of the Torah, the
Magna Carta, and the vision of our founding Fathers. It is a blueprint which guides the designers and the builders of
the nation in each generation. In effect, then, the Written Torah is an abstract of a
fuller expanded gift that Hashem gave Israel, the Torah sh'b'al Peh, the Oral
Law. The Oral Law is the underpinnings
of the Written Law and by its very nature of being a Weltanschaung, it could
not be frozen in stone or parchment. The Written Law can understood only in
conjunction with the Oral Law: 1.
The Torah says:
“V'za-vach-ta ka-ahser
tsee-vee-see-cha” (You shall slaughter [the animal] as I commanded you).
Nowhere in the Torah do we find G-d commanding Moshe about the laws of Schita
(slaughter). 2.
The Torah says:
“Hachodesh Ha-zeh La-chem rosh cha-da-shim” (This month [Nissan] is the head of
all the months.” When G-d uses the term “zeh” (this), which is a
demonstrative word, what does he refer to?
How did Moshe know the basis for the calculation of the month? What determined it? It is nowhere written in the Torah. 3.
The Torah says:
“Ayin ta-chas ayin. Shayne ta-chas
shayne” (An eye for an eye. a tooth for a tooth). Torah Law at all times meant that as
monetary compensation; never
literally. Where can see find that in
the written Torah? It's not there. 4.
The Torah says:
“Seven days shall you dwell in a succah.” Where is the source of how to build the succah, it's
height, its size, the acceptable materials that may be used and the definition of the essential parts of
the succah? The Written Torah is silent
on all this, and yet every Jew knows what a succah should look like. 5.
The Torah says:
“And you shall take for yourselves the fruit of a beautiful tree.” What fruit does the Torah mean? Where is there any reference in the Torah to
the citron, the Esrog? There is none,
and yet Jews the world over know what an esrog is! It is the Torah sh'b'al Peh, the Oral Torah that
supplies the details. These are but a
few examples of why, without the Oral Law, the Written Torah has no meaning. Moshe spent those 40 days and nights receiving the
Oral Law, in its entirety, with all the details and nuances, so that in future
generations, should there be an outstanding scholar who might extrapolate and
infer from what he has received by the Messorah, (the transmission of the
Torah) – that, too, was what Moshe learned on Sinai from G-d. |